HISTORY REPEATING
The opening stories of Doctor Who's 2015 series have drawn heavily on other sources, with varying results.
THE
WITCH’S FAMILIAR'SHH! Don't mention the viewing figures!' (Image copyright: BBC) |
The performances were great, the
visual effects impressive, the direction inventive, but…
‘The Witch’s Familiar’ didn’t work for me because it focused solely
on the fate of the regular/recurring characters. Nine years into 21st
century Doctor Who, we know that the Doctor, the companion
and the Master aren’t going to die, and that Davros probably won’t, so with the
fate of no supporting characters at stake, the inevitable resolution of the
regulars surviving wasn’t a surprise. The conclusion of Davros (inevitably)
tricking the Doctor and the Doctor (inevitably) anticipating being tricked and
outthinking Davros was also predictable and disappointing, too.
I guess that’s a case of being
careful what you wish for: two weeks ago, I’d wanted ‘50 minutes of the Doctor
debating morality and ethics with the Dalek’s creator,’ and when the script
concentrated on that – with Peter Capaldi and Julian Bleach at the top of their
game – you forgot about the limitations of the set-up, and were swept up in the
idea of Davros being given a redemptive death by the Doctor showing him some compassion.
That’s a lovely blurring of the moral certainties around the characters that was
completely flattened by the clichéd ‘I wasn’t fooled for a minute!’ ending.
(Image copyright: DC Comics, 1988) |
Moffat also snuck in another two pleasing
references, one to Monty Python’s Flying
Circus and the other to Michael Caine’s ‘60s caper movie The Italian Job. (I’m not going to say
what they are: you can have fun working it out). I’d also bet that the Doctor
zooming around in Davros’s chair among the Daleks – a great image – was
inspired by a 1960s TV Comic strip in
which the Second Doctor commandeers the bottom half of a Dalek and does the
same.
Those incidental pleasures aside, what
concerned me most about the opening Dalek two-parter was the way it recycled a
lot of previously used Doctor Who ideas:
the Doctor missing/on the verge of death, the impossible girl imprisoned inside
a Dalek – even if the psychology behind that was a clever touch – and Daleks
turning on Daleks are all ideas that have been done before, some of them very
recently. I can’t decide if the decrepit Daleks made of sewage rising up
against the Dalek/Time Lord hybrids – the Daleks being defeated by their own
crap, effectively – was an inspired concept or the most risible that Doctor Who’s ever come up with. The
jokey line ‘Dalek Supreme, your sewers are revolting’ didn’t help.
You can have all the stunning
production values and set pieces you want, but ‘Sorcerer’/’Witch’ relied too
much on them, at the expense of what Doctor
Who’s always done best – tell a good, well thought out story.
Bit to rewind: Missy pushing
Clara into the sewer.
UNDER
THE LAKE
Not telling a good story isn’t a
criticism you could make of Toby Whithouse’s first script for Capaldi. A new
take on the classic Doctor Who
scenario of an isolated based under siege, it was genuinely creepy, atmospheric
and strange. It might have been built from the science fiction films Solaris, Quatermass and the Pit, the Alien movies, The Abyss and Event Horizon,
but Doctor Who has always borrowed
from other fictions. It’s the flip side to filling a story with predictable series
continuity – making something creatively new from external sources.
‘Under the Lake’ has what I like best
about Doctor Who: a situation the
Doctor hasn’t encountered before, so he has to work it out with the help of the
new people he encounters, who in turn gradually come to trust him. That concept
never gets old, as you can take it in
so many directions. Ghosts under water? Terrific.
OK, there could have been bit more
conflict and character among the base crew, but, for the first time in a very
long time in Doctor Who, it was great
to see someone who was disabled, the deaf Cass (played by the deaf actress
Sophie Leigh Stone), in a position of authority. I had hoped she would be there
as a virtue of her fitness for the job, so it was slightly disappointing her
deafness became a plot point as she was able to lip read what the ghosts were
saying. Still, a major step forward.
The pace was slow, but it needed to
be, and I enjoyed the long, cerebral dialogue scenes. Sonic sunglasses? Not
sure, although Capaldi looks good in them, but what I didn’t like was the
cliffhanger that revealed the Doctor had apparently died – again! Is anyone paying attention to the order these stories are
shown in?
So far, the opening two stories are the
reverse of each other: Moffat’s full of recycled Doctor Who ideas with understated genre allusions, Whithouse’s a
new take on a staple Doctor Who format
with obvious, but cleverly reinterpreted, cinematic reference points.
I’m really looking forward to next
week, but here’s a thing: can we please have a new Doctor Who story that doesn’t owe a huge creative debt to something
else? We did last year.
Bit to rewind: The Doctor
sorting through his ‘tactful’ prompt cards.
While I was typing this up in the
library, a young boy from a visiting class was excitedly telling his teacher
about the opening Dalek story.
What do I know?
No comments:
Post a Comment