Peter Harness's allegory on terrorism, immigration and race relations comes into focus in a stunning second half.
What's in the box, Osgood? (Image copyright: BBC) |
I’ve been thinking a lot about satire in Doctor Who this week. Specifically, if I was too hard on last week’s ‘The Zygon Invasion,’ as it’s allusions to Islamic State terrorism and immigration in general weren’t exactly understated. I came to the conclusion that I wasn’t. In the past, Doctor Who has done satire beautifully. The series’ very first trip to another planet, ‘The Mutants (a.k.a. The Daleks)’, was a nuclear war allegory, but it didn’t resort to the sledgehammer-subtle topical references of last week; the parable arose from intelligent conjecture on a contemporary situation. Likewise ‘Carnival of Monsters’: the alien Miniscope is analogous to television, but the device was also a carefully thought out sci-fi idea wrapped up in a political plot.
Interestingly, conflicts that are morally and ethically murky have made TV sci-fi writers nervous in the past. I caught the original, 1960s Star Trek series’ ‘A Private Little War’ this week. When Captain Kirk and company find that the Klingons have been arming one primitive tribe on a neutral planet with flintlocks, after a thumpingly direct reference to ‘brush wars on the Asian continent’, before you can shout ‘Vietnam!’ Kirk has decided to start an arms race by giving an opposing community similar guns, even though he knows it’s wrong. For Star Trek this is a very cynical ending – significantly, the only one in its initial run – totally contradicting the utopian ‘United Nations in space’ remit of the series. Trying to make a comment on something that was happening in the real word, writer and creator Gene Roddenberry effectively gave up creatively (or revealed his true political colours).
Bearing all that in mind, it was going to be intriguing how the concluding episode of the Zygon two-parter played out. In a week that saw a Russian airliner apparently blown up by ISIS, would it have the courage to make a profound statement on relations between different cultures (‘Doctor Who and the Silurians’), or give in with a moral cop-out (‘Kill the Moon’)?
As it turns out, the former. And an optimistic one at that.
Zygella: terrifying. (Image copyright: BBC) |
The main man was on fire this week. (Image copyright: BBC) |
Picked you up on my TV screen... (Image copyright: BBC) |
To use a random football reference, ‘The Zygon Invasion/Inversion’ was the proverbial game of two halves. In the unfocused first episode, the symbolism was at its most obvious and the tone uncertain. In the focused second, unsurprisingly the allegory and drama were at their most intelligent and strongest, delivering one of the best episodes of this series and Capaldi’s tenure so far; I reckon in years to come the closing Black Archive sequence will be seen as one of the classic moments of Doctor Who (if it isn’t already). Ultimately Harness’s tale was really rewarding, and it was good to see him have the artistic confidence to more than better Trek’s ‘A Private Little War’.
Whether it was always intended to transmit ‘The Zygon Inversion’ on Remembrance weekend or not, it was very timely, particularly as it will make children think about important issues (if, of course, there were any watching at 8pm). On The Andrew Marr Show this morning, they were discussing the nuclear deterrent and speculating whether or not ISIS now have missiles that can bring down airliners.
If only they would sit down and talk.
If only they would sit down and talk.
Bit to rewind (again and again): The climactic sequence in the Black Archive.
No comments:
Post a Comment